Archive for the ‘Bad Marriage Role Model’ Category

A seduction fail leads to a marriage discovery

February 1st, 2012

Recently there was an incident…

It started out innocently, with me trying out a new “seductive move”. I’m not going into specifics, but let’s just say it was a little gesture. The kind of thing Melissa would melt at if Brad Pitt did it in a movie.

Except Melissa didn’t melt. She burst out laughing. And kept laughing at me for a long time.

Seduction fail.

It got me thinking about something we learned last year: that people have different love languages, or ways of expressing love. For your partner to really understand that you love her, you need to express it in her love language. It’s one of the most powerful and useful marriage lessons we’ve ever learned. Now I’m realizing that this lesson might also apply to seduction. To successfully put the moves on, you’ve got to know your partner’s seduction language.

For example, I know what Melissa’s seduction language is. It’s French. She would find it incredibly seductive if I were French. Not just someone who’d moved to France and gained citizenship, but a full-on, culturally Gallic man, with the accent, the vague sense of arrogance and propensity to say the word ‘bof‘. I mean, if I moved to Paris now and really immersed myself in the culture, I could probably be that man in somewhere around ten or fifteen years.

"Bof..."

Or she would be very seduced if I could dance extremely well. I’m white, straight and English. I’m not sure there are dance instructors in the world who could get my skills up to snuff. Or she would be pretty damn seduced if I had Ryan Gosling’s body.

So I know what I must do to seduce her and it will just takes six months of grueling workouts for me to able to speak that particular “seduction language”. But what about me? Would I be seduced by walking around a museum in Paris or some salsa dancing? Nope, not really. My seduction language involves lacy undercrackers, hosiery, make-up and lipstick, skirts that ride up too high and tops that come down too low.

In fact, my seduction language doesn’t involve words at all. It’s more of a sign-language, actually. If I see that Melissa has slipped into some lacy knickers, I know she is sending me a seductive message in my language. But when I put on my best Calvin Kleins? She hardly bats an eyelid.

It seems to me that women, or at least in this case Melissa, have it pretty easy. I mean, what’s a quick trip to Vicky’s Secret compared to 6 months in the gym or 10 years in France? Still, if it means more sexy time than I’ll definitely keep pumping iron. Learning another person’s seduction language isn’t easy. But the rewards are well worth it.

And as for what the new “seduction move” was that I tried on Melissa? I’ve threatened her with divorce if she ever reveals it.

I have a theory about the Seal & Heidi breakup

January 27th, 2012

Is it just me or is every celebrity marriage dissolving in front of our eyes? I mean, Russell Brand and Katy Perry is one thing – not even they can have imagined it would last as long as it did – but now the news that Heidi and Seal are to divorce? It’s just too much.

The interwebs are aflame with disbelief. Not Heidi and Seal! they say. Of all the celebrity couples out there, we thought at least they would last.

Am I the only one who thinks a white scarf runs the risk of making you look like Mumm-Raa from ThunderCats?

This got me thinking.

Why is it everyone was so convinced that Heidi and Seal’s marriage was so goshdarnit perfect? It’s not like any of us could tell how well they communicated, or how well they physically clicked and used intimacy as a glue to hold their relationship together. We don’t know what their respective love languages are, and how fluent each was in the other’s.

I did a quick google of all the blog posts and news items and it turns out that everyone in the entire world who thought they were a solid couple based that belief on one main factor.

They renewed their vows each year in a lavish ceremony.

As far as I’m concerned, there’s definitely a risk that if you do a lot to outwardly show how in love you are and what a great couple you are, it’s either an attempt to mask the fact that you’re a terrible couple, or at the very least it’s an activity that takes your energy and focus away from actually spending time doing the real things that will sustain and improve your marriage. Melissa thinks that the fact I’m making this statement on a blog all about our marriage is hypocritical. But the difference (I think) is that this blog is reflective of the amount of work we put into our marriage. When things aren’t going so well, we share it.

I’ve got nothing against vow renewals. Melissa is desperately trying to convince me that we should have one, as a way to mark the amazing improvements we’ve made in our marriage over the past couple of years. TLHP alum Alisa Bowman and her husband Mark had one because they turned their marriage around from the brink of failure.

But an annual vow renewal has all the power stripped out of it because it becomes a foregone conclusion. Which means you stop thinking about whether you want to renew your vows, and start doing it because that’s what you do. It’s a little like giving medals to all the kids who take part in the race. Sure, it makes it look like everyone’s a winner, but that doesn’t mean you won’t find someone crying under the bleachers before the afternoon is over.

Do you think there’s more to the Heidi and Seal situation than meets the eye? What’s your theory?

Should we judge short-lived celebrity marriages?

December 12th, 2011

Back in January I wrote a blog post about the married couples we’d most like to interview. On the first draft I included Ryan Reynolds and Scarlett Johansson, but by the time the post was due to be published, they’d announced that, after two years of marriage, they were divorcing.

And we judged. We said “if you give up after two years, you haven’t tried hard enough.”

How is it possible that neither of these people is Canadian?

At the start of November, another celebrity divorce stayed under the radar. You may not even have heard about it. Zooey Deschanel (professional kook and star of one of the last decade’s best movies, Elf (500) Days of Summer) announced her divorce from Death Cab For Cutie frontman Benjamin Gibbard.

After two years.

Now, the reason it stayed under the radar was because – on a good day to bury bad divorce news – the announcement came just a day after Kim Kardashian filed for a divorce from her husband of 72 days, Kris Humphries.

And now that the Kardash dust has settled, I’m tempted to throw some retrospective judgement at Zooey and Ben. Two years, guys? That’s the best you can do? What did you think marriage was going to entail? How can you give up on your marriage after two short years?

No-one should stay in a marriage that isn’t working, but equally, shouldn’t one only leave after all attempts to save the marriage have been exhausted? How many attempts can you have made if you’ve only been married two years?

But are we right to judge Zooey, Ben, Ryan, Scarlett, Kim, Kris, Ashton and Demi? Why is it anyone’s business what anyone else chooses to do with their lives? After all, if we (vehemently) believe that same sex couples have the right to get married, shouldn’t we also believe that any couple has the right to whatever sort of marriage they want – even if it’s a frivolous, misguided one?

Probably.

Which is why I’m setting aside judgement of stupid celebrity marriages. If Zooey and Ben are ready to throw in the towel, it doesn’t really affect me. And it certainly doesn’t affect my marriage.

Response to Susan Pease Gadoua: Why limited term marriages are a bad idea

October 17th, 2011

Former TLHP interviewee and deeply NSFW blogger Stefanie twitter-challenged us to write a blog about a super interesting post she found on HuffPo, entitled What Marriage Really Needs Is for Us to Get “Whys”.

It sounds like an admirable topic, and the sort of thing we ourselves would normally write about, but it turns out the blog post was actually all about how it might be good to offer marriages of different durations based on the couple’s reasons for getting married.

Uhhh….. what?

The article says:

I feel that we still have a one-size-fits-all model for partnering in a culture that increasingly celebrates our differences.

Yup.

But divorce is happening and it is here to stay. In fact, I think one of the main reasons it is so common is that people have not asked themselves why, other than for love, they want to marry.

Agreed.

The unspoken assumption is that everyone who marries at 25 is doing so in order to have kids, raise a family and live happily ever after.

Really? I don’t assume that.

And then it gets really weird.

If it were acceptable for people to wed for a variety of reasons, perhaps we would see contracts of 20 years for a parenting marriage, five-year renewable contracts for a financial security marriage, and two-year renewable agreements for companionship marriages.

Contracts? Financial security marriage? What in the blue hell are you talking about? Whatever it is you’re talking about, Susan Pease Gadoua, it isn’t marriage, and here’s why:

Marriage is not a fixed thing.

What if you sign up for your 20 year co-parenting “contract” and then realize after a couple of years that you don’t want kids. Or can’t have them. Does your contract need to be renegotiated? What if you think you’re marrying for financial security, but it turns out you actually like the companionship?

Yes, a failure to understand why one wants to get married is a factor in divorce, but that doesn’t mean that marriages should only aim to have a limited term. The bigger problem with most marriages is precisely that people think they’re signing up to something that can be foreseen and quantified from day one: this is what our marriage is now and will be for the rest of the marriage. The idea of a two or five or twenty year “contract” only serves to reinforce this ridiculous notion:

Those who married would go into the union knowing exactly what was expected of them and how long it would last. Rather than a one-size-fits-all institution, people could pick the type and length of marriage they truly wanted. Marriages with an agreed upon agenda and end date would then terminate naturally.

Another set of TLHP interviewees, Meghan and Tony, talked about accepting that your spouse – and indeed the very substance of your marriage – is going to change over time. The trick is not in trying to resist that change and make someone stick to the plan they signed up for, but rather to be flexible enough to accept change even as you change yourself, and find a way to make those changes together.

The approach that Susan Pease Gadoua seems to be endorsing here strikes me a little like a tango. We’re here now, and in 20 years time we will have progressed, in a straight line, to that point over there. Real marriage is like a foxtrot – it’s going to take a varied and sometimes unpredictable course, but if you and your spouse can successfully navigate that path together, your lives will be so much the richer for it.

And, if you do it in tails and a crazy blue dress, you’ll look awesome.

Thoughts on Anais Nin and how we perceive female infidelity

August 29th, 2011

Have you ever heard of Anais Nin? She was a French-Cuban writer of erotic literature, muse to Henry Miller, bigamist and ultimately, a feminist icon. I saw a documentary about her when I was in my early 20s and became fascinated by her story.

I thought of her again a couple of weeks back, when Tom wrote this blog about how Hollywood movies portrayed women who have affairs. Tom was annoyed at the double standard that seems to prevail in films these days: if a man cheats, he’s a scumbag. If a woman cheats, she’s strong and empowered.

First of all, let me state for the record that I can see why this annoys Tom, but it got me thinking about how our culture perceives female infidelity. And that got me thinking about Anais Nin. See, Nin was kind of the Poster Girl for female infidelity. Her published journals revealed the intimate details of her affair with Henry Miller (writer of Tropic of Cancer, a perennial resident on the “banned books” list for its racy content) while she was married to businessman Hugh Parker Guiler.

Nin’s  marriage weathered the coming and going (and oh, was there coming) of Henry Miller, plus the seduction of not one but TWO of her psychotherapists and dalliances with other leading literary figures such as Gore Vidal. But what really distinguished Nin’s record was when she took up with an actor whom she met in an elevator and eventually married… while still married to Guiler!  For years, she kept two residences (one in LA with the actor and one in New York City with her long-suffering husband), had two last names and spun a web of deceit so confusing that she needed to keep track of her lies with notes.

With all that said, what really interests me is that Nin was adopted as a feminist icon in the ’60s. Tom’s blog got me thinking about that. What made Nin so appealing to feminists? Why was I utterly fascinated by her story when I first learned about her? Is this the same thing that’s driving the current Hollywood portrayal of unfaithful women as, somehow, admirable?

I think it might be. Nin became a role model in the 1960s when women were coming out of a period where they lacked the financial and social power of their male counterparts. Nin’s actions might not seem very moral but they do seem powerful, especially for the time. It’s her total disregard for all of the virtues women are classically supposed to embody: goodness, purity, submissiveness, modesty, selflessness. It’s the unabashed pursuit of her own pleasure, I think, that women find strangely, shockingly admirable. I find myself torn between wanting to say “You go, Anais, with your bad, bohemian self” and “Wow, Anais, you’re a totally selfish slut and your husband shoulda’ kicked you to the curb.” (I’m sort of channeling how Anais might have fared with the audience on Maury Povich).

As it turns out, Anais Nin was in many ways a lost and unhappy woman. Most of her sexual obsessions and intimacy issues stemmed from a tormented relationship with her Father, who molested her when she was a girl and abandoned her family. She sought validation in the arms of so many men because she lacked it in girlhood.

Beyond that, and I guess this is the point I’m building up to but afraid that readers will find offensive, is that I like the idea that our culture can mythologize a flawed female. As far as women have come in terms of equality, you still go to the movies and see men racing around having lots of adventures, lots of sex, going for what they want without regret. And women? There are exceptions but we still mostly see them as the supportive girlfriend, the loving wife, the doting daughter, the damsel in distress. I’m grateful that Nin represents an alternative and I love that she, through her actions and her honesty, opened a dialogue about women’s complex sexual and emotional needs.

As much as I understand Tom finding it offensive that Hollywood seems to be telling women that it’s ok to leave their husbands if the guy in question lets himself go, part of me is glad that we’re moving away from a society that made women feel they stuck with their marriage no matter what. How many women have felt powerless to choose their own paths? Of the many who did, Anais Nin was certainly not one of them.

Are you familiar with Anais Nin’s story? Do you think she deserves to be a feminist icon? What do you think about how women’s infidelity is portrayed? If you want to learn more about Anais Nin, there have been multiple biographies published on her, many of her books and journals are still in print and you could also check out the film “Henry and June” which fictionalized her complex relationship with Henry Miller and his wife.

 

 

Are movies teaching women that it’s ok to cheat on their husbands?

August 10th, 2011

Last Friday we went to see Crazy, Stupid, Love, the new rom-com with a stellar cast, including Steve Carell, Julianne Moore, Emma Stone and some ugly, fat dude whose name I didn’t catch. Ron Duckling or something.

Overall the movie was pretty funny, pretty entertaining, pretty much worth seeing, except for one dark undertone that kinda ruined it for me.

It’s a theme I’ve noticed elsewhere in popular culture and I have to say, I find it pretty abhorrent.

It goes something like this:

If you’re a woman (Julianne Moore) and your husband of twenty-five years (Steve Carell) isn’t the best communicator, and has let himself go a little, then you are completely and totally justified in cheating on him with another man (Kevin Bacon).

Rarely seen shot of Ron Duckling before they brought in the CGI wizards.

After all – so the movie tell us – he needs a wake-up call so that he’ll start dressing nicer and taking you to play miniature golf again and generally paying you more attention. And there’s no better wake-up call than confessing that you and the Bacon got it on. Wait. Miniature golf?

Here’s a list of things a woman in Julianne’s position is actually justified in doing:

  • talking to her husband about the way he dresses, the lack of attention he pays her, etc.
  • suggesting individual or group counseling if communication is proving really difficult
  • explaining to her husband exactly how his behavior makes her feel, and the things he could do that would make her feel better
  • taking ownership for things she may or may not be doing that are contributing to problems in the marriage
  • if all the above fails, leaving the marriage

At that point, and only at that point, is she justified in Baconating herself.

I mean, can you imagine a Hollywood movie in which a husband sleeps with another woman because his wife has let herself go physically, and isn’t that interested in paying him attention or doing things that appeal to his interests? Sure. But what if the happy ending of that movie was that the passed-over wife got her shit together and pandered to her husband enough to win him back? As a collective audience we would say that the movie was horrible, misogynistic, offensive.

And yet, that is the happy ending of Crazy, Stupid, Love. Steve Carell wins back an unapologetic Julianne Moore and is decidedly thankful for her interlude with the Bacon Bits – because it taught him a valuable lesson about fighting for his soulmate.

And let’s be clear about one thing. I definitely didn’t decide to hate this movie because Ron Duckling’s torso made me feel about as inadequate and unattractive as it’s possible for a dude with an English accent and this hair to feel. Nosireeebob.

Bad marriage? Or bad spouse?

November 8th, 2010

Working on TLHP can be a real eye-opener sometimes.

I was just googling other marriage blogs so I could make a nice list to refer back to later. You see, we’re trying to increase our exposure by connecting with other marriage bloggers, offering comments and links and so forth.

The first link that comes up on a Google search of “marriage blog” is Bad Marriage: A Man’s Chronicle of his Failing Marriage (http://badmarriageblog.blogspot.com/) which is kind of weird because the latest post is no more recent than July, 2005.

When I saw that, I almost clicked ‘back’ immediately – there’s no networking opportunity there, after all. But I stuck with it, and started reading some of the posts from the beginning (you need to head into the archives from September 2003 for that).

Wow.

Just… wow.

The idea is that this guy, whoever and wherever he is, was conscious that his marriage was failing, and was headed towards an inevitable divorce, and decided to blog about it. In great, steaming, vitriolic fashion. With the gloves off.

And it makes for interesting reading because with every post you can say to yourself even when I’m behaving at my absolute worst, I am still 1,000,000 times less of a jerk than this guy.

Part of me would love to know what has happened to the dude in the five years since his sign off. I would hazard a guess that if he remarried, the new marriage is also headed for failure, because it’s clear from his posts that he doesn’t really get it.

And, of course, the worst of it is that he spent so much time communicating so clearly, in his blog entries, exactly what the problems were in the marriage, where resolution could be found, how the difficulties they faced made him feel….

…but I’d bet my mortgage that he didn’t communicate any of that to his wife.

Shonda Rhimes has a strange view of marriage

October 25th, 2010

Okay, let’s start this off with a disclaimer: I know Grey’s Anatomy is trashy TV. I know, I know. But Melissa started watching it a few years ago and I got sucked in. No excuse, I know.

Another disclaimer: this entire entry is going to be pretty boring if you’ve managed to avoid the bear-trap of attraction to Grey’s Anatomy.

Last night, while catching up on a couple of recent episodes on abc.com (a fantastic service but for the un-full-screening at every ad break – very annoying), I noticed that the show has an extremely dim view of marriage.

Let’s recap:

1) Ellis Grey had a long-running affair with Richard Webber, leading to the breakdown of her marriage to Thatcher, Thatcher’s ensuing alcholism and absent parenting. The affair also caused the breakdown of Webber’s marriage.

2) Meredith and Derek’s marriage consists of nothing more formal than a scribble on a post-it.

3) George and Callie eloped for no good reason and their marriage subsequently broke down – within a couple of months – when George slept with Izzie.

4) Izzie and Karev got married on the spur of the moment, and the marriage didn’t last longer than a couple of months because she got a brain tumor and went nuts.

5) Burke and Christina almost got married – not quite on spur of the moment, but with a very short engagement and pretty much no build up. I don’t remember why they didn’t go through with it. It was a very boring storyline.

6) Owen and Christina got married pretty much on the spur of the moment, and the first time they had a fight, Christina handed back the wedding ring.

7) Miranda’s marriage failed because she wasn’t prepared to compromise – in any way – about the amount of time and effort she was putting into work versus home life.

8 ) Sloan wants to go straight from not being with Lexie to proposing.

9) Derek and Addison’s marriage broke down because she slept with Sloan, but after a couple of months they were all best friends again.

What the hell!?

Clearly, in creator Shonda Rhimes’ world, marriage is something that you do because you’ve got an evening free, safe in the knowledge that you can break it off the next time McSteamy casts a come hither look in your general direction. And, of course, marriage is something that should never get in the way of that all-important doctoring.

And while we’re on the subject, can some other dudes back me up on the fact that Lexie is hotter than the sun? It’s an ongoing argument in our house that could use a resolution.

The first step is admitting you have a problem

August 19th, 2010

She’s fallen off the wagon.

If you were paying attention a few weeks ago, you’ll have noticed that Melissa claimed she was moving on from her old sunglasses.

This photo was taken this past weekend:

It might be time to stage an intervention.

Bad marriage role model contenders- Diego and Frida

July 6th, 2010

Diego and Frida: Bad role models for us all?

Something I realized early on in the process of creating The Long Haul Project: I need a Bad Marriage Role Model.

You see, learning about other people’s marriages can make you feel pretty bad about your own marriage. I am two things by nature: 1) competitive and 2) pessimistic. So when someone tells me how great their marriage is, I immediately think the following:

1) Is their marriage better than ours? If their marriage fought our marriage, would it win? If we both entered a marriage competition, would their marriage get the gold?

2) Our marriage will never be that good. We have way too many insurmountable problems and we might as well just give up on ever having a good marriage. Marriage sucks. I will die alone. Harumph.

And that leads me to Frida Kahlo’s birthday, which is today. Now, first and foremost let me say that I think Frida is a very interesting person in her own right. She paved the way for “celebrity artists” and advanced the concept of art as a vehicle to explore and express physical and emotional pain. Without Frida, would there have been an Andy Warhol? A Tracey Emin? A Madonna or Lady Gaga?

With that said, for the purposes of The Long Haul Project, what’s really interesting about Frida Kahlo is her marriage to Diego Rivera. As a couple, they are my first nomination for Bad Marriage Role Model!  Think of every problem a modern marriage goes through — competing careers, miscarriages, fights about where to live, infidelity— and these two went through it. Frida Kahlo once said, “I suffered two grave accidents in my life. One in which a streetcar knocked me down… The other accident is Diego.”

So anytime I feel my own marriage doesn’t stack up, I’ll just think of Diego and Frida and feel a whole lot better. It’s also strangely reassuring that even with their terrible problems and after divorcing in 1940, they reunited a decade later. Diego Rivera was with Frida Kahlo on her deathbed in 1954. If even Bad Marriage Role Models can manage that, there is hope for us all.

Let us know who you’d like to nominate as our next featured Bad Marriage Role Model.